Saturday 27 July 2013

A friend of mine told the following  to me. Just for fun's sake. Nothing personal. 

Who said Allah is God? Muhammad said! 
Who said that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah? Muhammad said!
Is Quran God-given? Who said? Muhammad said!
From where was acquired the matter in Quran? From Jibreel! And who said that? Muhmmad said!
Who is Jibreel? An angel of Allah! And who said that? Muhammad said!
Who said to believe firmly in Quran? Allah said! And who said that? Muhammad said!
Did Muhammad see Jibreel? Who told? Muhammad said!








What if what Muhammad lied? Muhammad does not lie.
Who said? Muhammad said.


This said, another thing is that nobody takes pain to check whether Muhammad was right or wrong. Simply jesting is very easy.

Friday 26 July 2013

What happened in Abbottabad?


America's military assignment in Abottabad, which killed Osama Bin Laden code-named Operation Neptune Spear, leaves too many a question unanswered. America unilaterally designed and executed the operation, which left Pakistan in an embarrassing position. Here are a few questions.
  • Is Pakistan, which is one of the few nuclear powers of the world, so incompetent? Neither did its intelligence agencies figure out the whole operation(or did they?) nor did the state detect foreign helicopters enter its boundaries and carry out a military operation so close to its nerve centre.
  • Osama Bin Laden very successfully hid himself 9 years in Pakistan. Accurately, his den was outside Kakul military academy, only 68 miles away from capital Islamabad. ('The den' was actually a palace like building.)Abottabad is a place so exposed that a man so important as Osama cannot be expected to live in complete anonymity. This naturally brings the following suspicions.
  • One of the hypotheses is that Pakistan may have protected him for 9 years and then, because of insecurity or some dissension, Pakistan might have betrayed him. This means that America might have got invisible support from Pakistan. If Pakistan openly took part in the operation, Islamic forces  would have wreaked havoc in the country. Pakistan is recognized as a safe haven for international terrorists.
  • Pakistan initially lauded the operation, soon the real sentiments came out from the skin. Pakistan people in general felt outraged by the action of America. More than the humiliation of finding a wanted terrorist in its own backyard, what resented them was the so called 'back-stabbing' action by USA. Pakistan has till now took a stand of denial in the case of Abbottabad, and has never shown the mind to address serious questions regarding Pakistan turning to a global jihad centre. Many Pakistanis believe that the death of Laden was 'a bad thing'.
  • Another explanation is that Pakistan is displaying much public indignation to avoid other countries (yes, India) and probably America emulating the May 2 operation in future.

Monday 22 July 2013

Go India Go

Indian cricket is at its best. It seems to have acquired the winning habit- just when Sachin, Dravid, Laxman, Zaheer and other great names disappeared from the ranks. Was it purely coincidental? Or was team India carrying these burdens for too long? Or did the stature of their names set such high standards that the newcomers were pressurized to rise to their standards? Whatever be the case, everything is happening right for team India. And for Dhoni.
                      Dhoni is the best thing that happened to Indian cricket in recent times. Gifted with unique leadership qualities, Dhoni is arguably the best finisher of the game now. The cool demeanor of Dhoni unnerves any opposition in any stage of the game. With the twenty-20 world cup, 50 overs cup and champions trophy, and the recent tri-nation cup in his pocket, Dhoni and his team looks hungry for more. 
                      Whatever the controversies, IPL has had an important role in shaping up the present team. It is a platform where the  inexperienced but talented players have an opportunity to prove their point. The only prize which now eludes the team is the number one spot in test rankings. Hope Dhoni and his men soon pocket that one too.

Gender bias in Indian films

Film forms a non-neglectable part of cultural life of India. Not for nothing is Bollywood the largest film-producing industry in the world(in terms of numbers). More than 800 films are brought out in Bollywood each year, and an average of fourteen million people (whoop!) go to movies on a daily basis. Those among us who haven't gone to a movie and enjoyed the experience form a microscopic minority. This brings us to some questions to be pondered over the subject.
Film forms the most popular media of creative expression in our country. So it ought not cause an individual to deviate from the moral line, if not cause a man to be morally better, say the 'art for man's sake' proponents. It is a debate in itself, but let us go further into the subject- the portrayal of women in films.
                  Lets take a general view of women in Indian films. Who is considered as an ideal woman in our films? Traditionally, an ideal woman is one who keeps herself 'pure'. Description- she should keep her chastity untouched for one man, her man; she should confine herself willfully within the patriarchal prescription of 'a woman's position' in a society. For example, we can identify a 'bad woman' or a 'woman-antagonist' in a film just by observing the way she is portrayed. Normally, she may be wearing tight jeans and apparel, she may be smoking a cigarette, she may be domineering over her spouse, and she would definitely be bold and self expressive. And whenever a woman transgresses the boundaries prescribed by men, the director makes sure that she pays the price. Another common stereotype found in films is that when a good woman falls, like when she loses her purity when someone(villain) rapes her, she must be killed despite her innate goodness, so that the hero of the story escapes from being bond to an 'impure' woman. There are several such instances in Tamil and Hindi films.
But in case if it is the hero who rapes the actress, she tries to win him as husband, because since she is now impure, nobody will accept her according to the directors, and it is her necessity to make him his wife. The recent hit Ranjhaana has also invited some criticisms on this point. The film states indirectly that it was the fault of the lead female to be in close proximity of the hero, and thus inspired his romantic fascinations, though she only had friendly intentions. Had she stayed away from him, she would not have caused him to love her. It is like saying that had the rape victim stayed in house, she would have escaped from being raped.
   Other things observable in Indians films is the position of the heroine subservient to the hero, exhibitionism of heroines, the shorter span of star-status of heroine compared to the hero, etc.
    But we cant condemn the films alone for bias in it. Films draw heavily from reality. They are but a part of our cultural heritage. What they do is to reinforce certain notions. An action film doesn't normally motivate a guy to take up an AK 47 and kill all his adversaries. But he wold really be enjoying the idea when he watches the film.
       The growing prominence of feminism means that there are two kinds of films: women-centric and others. We may have to wait for our films to evolve, and so must our society, when sexism is abolished and both sexes can perform freely for the general improvement of mankind.

Friday 19 July 2013

Sathasivam appointed new CJI


Supreme court judge P. Sathasivam appointed as the new Chief Justice of India. Sathasivam succeeded CJI Altamas Kabir. President Pranab Mukherjee administered the oath to Sathasivam at Rashtrapati Bhawan. He will remain in office tillApril 26, 2014. He sworn as the 40 th Chief Justice of India.
 Justice Sathasivam delivered the verdict in the controversial triple murder case of Stains and upheld the conviction of Dara Singh. On 19 April 2010, he delivered the judgement in the Jessic Lal Mueder Case. Other major judgements include the Mumbai blasts case and that of  pakistani scientist Mohammed Khalil Chisti.


UN - certain questions

Editorial, The Hindu, July 19, 2013 discusses a question: Is United Nations racist? Ramesh Thakkur, a former senior UN official himself, thinks so. Most of the top posts of the UN are held by Westerners.The UN is cynical about non-Europeans occupying its important offices because, Ramesh says, probably they are prejudiced about Asians, or Africans- or non-Europeans for the matter- are incompetent and inefficient.In other words, they think that others are racially inferior to the Europeans. But this can be understood as a myth, if we are are open to study the examples from the real world.
Asians contribute about 60% of the world population. But the representation that the whole of Asia has in the senior staff of the Secretariat is roughly equal to the number of representation for two countries: Canada and the U.S.-which constitute just 5% of the world population. A striking point which Ramesh puts foreward  in the context is that wouldn't we be outraged if the top two posts of the U.N women were men? Then how come the developing countries raise no voice against the double standards set by their developed counterparts? The disputing answer he comes to is that the developing countries have come to terms with the inferiority imposed upon them.Maybe the point was already clear when Ramesh put towards the beginning of his discourse that Sergio Vieira de Mello, one of the brightest UN officials, was 'more European than most Europeans'. The unconscious servility of our collective racial mind may have unintentionally found an expression in these lines.

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/04/us-must-demand-transparency-and-accountability-in-appointment-of-top-level-un-officials
This is an article by Brett D. Schaefer, the Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs at Heritage's Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom. This is a point in his aritcle: 
"Indeed, it is widely recognized that certain senior positions are coveted by certain countries or regions, and that the Secretary-General often appoints candidates proffered by certain nations, or groups of nations, to specific USG and ASG positions.Senior officials appointed by the General Assembly cannot be removed by the Secretary-General without that body’s consent."

Thursday 18 July 2013

some black and white thoughts

America is believed to be a 'free country'. Discrimination against blacks was believed to be a thing of the past. But the acquittal of Zimmerman from the murder of Trayvon Martin has brought back the racist psyche from the era of slavery. It appears to be clear as daylight the fact that Zimmerman had shot Martin dead. But he was judged 'not guilty' in the verdict . This has created feelings of distrust and insecurity in the minds of people who are not so bright in colour.

Wednesday 17 July 2013

quotes

Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little push.

Tuesday 16 July 2013

Voices From Solitary: A Sentence Worse Than Death





Voices From Solitary: A Sentence Worse Than Death

MAR. 18, 2013 
This article originally appeared on Solitary Watch.
The following essay is by William Blake, who has been held in solitary confinement for nearly 26 years. Currently he is in administrative segregation at Elmira Correctional Facility, a maximum security facility located in south central New York State. In 1987, Blake, then 23 and in county court on a drug charge, murdered one deputy and wounded another in a failed escape attempt. Sentenced to 77 years to life, Blake has no chance of ever leaving prison alive, and almost no chance of ever leaving solitary — a fate he considers “a sentence worse than death.”
This powerful essay earned Blake an Honorable Mention in the Yale Law Journal’s Prison Law Writing Contest, chosen from more than 1,500 entries. He describes here in painstaking detail his excruciating experiences over the last quarter-century. “I’ve read of the studies done regarding the effects of long-term isolation in solitary confinement on inmates, seen how researchers say it can ruin a man’s mind, and I’ve watched with my own eyes the slow descent of sane men into madness—sometimes not so slow,” Blake writes. “What I’ve never seen the experts write about, though, is what year after year of abject isolation can do to that immaterial part in our middle where hopes survive or die and the spirit resides.” That is what Blake himself seeks to convey in his essay. —Lisa Dawson
“You deserve an eternity in hell,” Onondaga County Supreme Court judge Kevin Mulroy told me from his bench as I stood before him for sentencing on July 10, 1987. Apparently he had the idea that God was not the only one justified to make such judgment calls.
Judge Mulroy wanted to “pump six buck’s worth of electricity into [my] body,” he also said, though I suggest that it wouldn’t have taken six cent’s worth to get me good and dead. He must have wanted to reduce me and The Chair to a pile of ashes. My “friend” Governor Mario Cuomo wouldn’t allow him to do that, though, the judge went on, bemoaning New York State’s lack of a death statute due to the then-Governor’s repeated vetoes of death penalty bills that had been approved by the state legislature. Governor Cuomo’s publicly expressed dudgeon over being called a friend of mine by Judge Mulroy was understandable, given the crimes that I had just been convicted of committing. I didn’t care much for him either, truth be told. He built too many new prisons in my opinion, and cut academic and vocational programs in the prisons already standing.
I know that Judge Mulroy was not nearly alone in wanting to see me executed for the crime I committed when I shot two Onondaga County sheriff’s deputies inside the Town of Dewitt courtroom during a failed escape attempt, killing one and critically wounding the other. There were many people in the Syracuse area who shared his sentiments, to be sure. I read the hateful letters to the editor printed in the local newspapers; I could even feel the anger of the people when I’d go to court, so palpable was it. Even by the standards of my own belief system, such as it was back then, I deserved to die for what I had done. I took the life of a man without just cause, committing an act so monumentally wrong that I could not have argued that it was unfair had I been required to pay with my own life.
What nobody knew or suspected back then, not even I, on that very day I would begin suffering a punishment that I am convinced beyond all doubt is far worse than any death sentence could possibly have been. On July 10, 2012, I finished my 25th consecutive year in solitary confinement, where at the time of this writing I remain. Though it is true that I’ve never died and so don’t know exactly what the experience would entail, for the life of me I cannot fathom how dying any death could be harder or more terrible than living through all that I have been forced to endure for the last quarter-century.
Prisoners call it The Box. Prison authorities have euphemistically dubbed it the Special Housing Unit, or SHU (pronounced “shoe”) for short. In society it is known as solitary confinement. It is 23-hour a day lockdown in a cell smaller than some closets I’ve seen, with one hour allotted to “recreation” consisting of placement in a concrete enclosed yard by oneself or, in some prisons, a cage made of steel bars. There is nothing in a SHU yard but air: no TV, no balls to bounce, no games to play, no other inmates, nothing. There is very little allowed in a SHU cell, also. Three sets of plain white underwear, one pair of green pants, one green short-sleeved button-up shirt, one green sweatshirt, ten books or magazines total, twenty pictures of the people you love, writing supplies, a bar of soap, toothbrush and toothpaste, one deodorant stick but no shampoo, and that’s about it. No clothes of your own, only prison-made. No food from commissary or packages, only three unappetizing meals a day handed to you through a narrow slot in your cell door. No phone calls, no TV, no luxury items at all. You get a set of cheap headphones to use, and you can pick between the two or three (depending on which prison you’re in) jacks in the cell wall to plug into. You can listen to a TV station in one jack, and use your imagination while trying to figure out what is going on when the music indicates drama but the dialogue doesn’t suffice to tell you anything. Or you can listen to some music, but you’re out of luck if you’re a rock-n-roll fan and find only rap is playing.
Your options in what to do to occupy your time in SHU are scant, but there will be boredom aplenty. You probably think that you understand boredom, know its feel, but really you don’t. What you call boredom would seem a whirlwind of activity to me, choices so many that I’d likely be befuddled in trying to pick one over all the others. You could turn on a TV and watch a movie or some other show; I haven’t seen a TV since the 1980s. You could go for a walk in the neighborhood; I can’t walk more than a few feet in any direction before I run into a concrete wall or steel bars. You could pick up your phone and call a friend; I don’t know if I’d be able to remember how to make a collect call or even if the process is still the same, so many years it’s been since I’ve used a telephone. Play with your dog or cat and experience their love, or watch your fish in their aquarium; the only creatures I see daily are the mice and cockroaches that infect the unit, and they’re not very lovable and nothing much to look at. There is a pretty good list of options available to you, if you think about it, many things that you could do even when you believe you are so bored. You take them for granted because they are there all the time, but if it were all taken away you’d find yourself missing even the things that right now seem so small and insignificant. Even the smallest stuff can become as large as life when you have had nearly nothing for far too long.
I haven’t been outside in one of the SHU yards in this prison for about four years now. I haven’t seen a tree or blade of grass in all that time, and wouldn’t see these things were I to go back to the yard. In Elmira Correctional Facility, where I am presently imprisoned, the SHU yards are about three or four times as big as my cell. There are twelve SHU yards total, each surrounded by concrete walls, one or two of the walls lined with windows. If you look in the windows you’ll see the same SHU company that you live on, and maybe you’ll get a look at a guy who was locked next to you for months that you’ve talked to every day but had never before gotten a look at. If you look up you’ll find bars and a screen covering the yard, and if you’re lucky maybe you can see a bit of blue sky through the mesh, otherwise it’ll be hard to believe that you’re even outside. If it’s a good day you can walk around the SHU yard in small circles staring ahead with your mind on nothingness, like the nothing you’ve got in that lacuna with you. If it’s a bad day, though, maybe your mind will be filled with remembrances of all you used to have that you haven’t seen now for many years, and you’ll be missing it, feeling the loss, feeling it bad.
Life in the box is about an austere sameness that makes it difficult to tell one day from a thousand others. Nothing much and nothing new ever happen to tell you if it’ a Monday or a Friday, March or September, 1987 or 2012. The world turns, technology advances, and things in the streets change and keep changing all the time. Not so in a solitary confinement unit, however. I’ve never seen a cell phone except in pictures in magazines. I’ve never touched a computer in my life, never been on the Internet and wouldn’t know how to get there if you sat me in front of a computer, turned it on for me, and gave me directions. SHU is a timeless place, and I can honestly say that there is not a single thing I’d see looking around right now that is different from what I saw in Shawangunk Correctional Facility’s box when I first arrived there from Syracuse’s county jail in 1987. Indeed, there is probably nothing different in SHU now than in SHU a hundred years ago, save the headphones. Then and now there were a few books, a few prison-made clothing articles, walls and bars and human beings locked in cages… and misery.
There is always the misery. If you manage to escape it yourself for a time, there will ever be plenty around in others for you to sense; and though you’ll be unable to look into their eyes and see it, you might hear it in the nighttime when tough guys cry not-so-tough tears that are forced out of them by the unrelenting stress and strain that life in SHU is an exercise in.
I’ve read of the studies done regarding the effects of long-term isolation in solitary confinement on inmates, seen how researchers say it can ruin a man’s mind, and I’ve watched with my own eyes the slow descent of sane men into madness—sometimes not so slow. What I’ve never seen the experts write about, though, is what year after year of abject isolation can do to that immaterial part in our middle where hopes survive or die and the spirit resides. So please allow me to speak to you of what I’ve seen and felt during some of the harder times of my twenty-five-year SHU odyssey.
I’ve experienced times so difficult and felt broken and loneliness to such a degree that it seemed to be a physical thing inside so thick it felt like it was choking me, trying to squeeze the sanity from my mind, the spirit from my soul, and the life from my body. I’ve seen and felt hope becoming like a foggy ephemeral thing, hard to get ahold of, even harder to keep ahold of as the years and then decades disappeared while I stayed trapped in the emptiness of the SHU world. I’ve seen minds slipping down the slope of sanity, descending into insanity, and I’ve been terrified that I would end up like the guys around me that have cracked and become nuts. It’s a sad thing to watch a human being go insane before your eyes because he can’t handle the pressure that the box exerts on the mind, but it is sadder still to see the spirit shaken from a soul. And it is more disastrous. Sometimes the prison guards find them hanging and blue; sometimes their necks get broken when they jump from their bed, the sheet tied around the neck that’s also wrapped around the grate covering the light in the ceiling snapping taut with a pop. I’ve seen the spirit leaving men in SHU and have witnessed the results.
The box is a place like no other place on planet Earth. It’s a place where men full of rage can stand at their cell gates fulminating on their neighbor or neighbors, yelling and screaming and speaking some of the filthiest words that could ever come from a human mouth, do it for hours on end, and despite it all never suffer the loss of a single tooth, never get his head knocked clean off his shoulders. You will never hear words more despicable or see mouth wars more insane than what occurs all the time in SHU, not anywhere else in the world, because there would be serious violence before any person could peak so much foulness for so long. In the box the heavy steel bars allow mouths to run with impunity when they could not otherwise do so, while the ambient is one that is sorely conducive to an exceedingly hot sort of anger that seems to press the lips on to ridiculous extremes. Day and night I have been awakened to the sound of the rage being loosed loudly on SHU gates, and I’d be a liar if I said I haven’t at times been one of the madmen doing the yelling.
I have lived for months where the first thing I became aware of upon waking in the morning is the malodorous funk of human feces, tinged with the acrid stench of days-old urine, where I eat my breakfast, lunch, and dinner with that same stink assaulting my senses, and where the last thought I had before falling into unconscious sleep was: “Damn, it smells like shit in here.” I have felt like I was on an island surrounded by vicious sharks, flanked on both sides by mentally ill inmates who would splash their excrement all over their cells, all over the company outside their cells, and even all over themselves. I have went days into weeks that seemed like they’d never end without being able to sleep more than short snatches before I was shocked out of my dreams, and thrown back into a living nightmare, by the screams of sick men who have lost all ability to control themselves, or by the banging of cell bars and walls of these same madmen. I have been so tired when sleep inside was impossible that I went outside into a snowstorm to get some sleep.
The wind blew hard and snowflakes swirled around and around in the small SHU yard at Shawangunk, and I had but one cheap prison-produced coat on and a single set of state clothes beneath. To escape the biting cold I dug into the seven- or eight-foot high mountain of snow that was piled in the center of the yard, the accumulation from inmates shoveling a narrow path to walk along the perimeter. With bare hands gone numb, I dug out a small room in that pile of snow, making myself a sort of igloo. When it was done I crawled inside, rolled onto my back on the snow-covered concrete ground, and almost instantly fell asleep, my bare head pillowed in the snow. I didn’t even have a hat to wear.
An hour or so later I was awakened by the guards come to take me back to the stink and insanity inside: “Blake, rec’s over…” I had gotten an hour’s straight sleep, minus the few minutes it had taken me to dig my igloo. That was more than I had gotten in weeks without being shocked awake by the CA-RACK! of a sneaker being slapped into a plexiglass shield covering the cell of an inmate who had thrown things nasty; or the THUD-THUD-THUD! of an inmate pounding his cell wall, or bars being banged, gates being kicked and rattled, or men screaming like they’re dying and maybe wishing that they were; or to the tirade of an inmate letting loose his pent-up rage on a guard or fellow inmate, sounding every bit the lunatic that too long a time in the mind-breaking confines of the box had caused him to be.
I have been so exhausted physically, mental strength being tested to limits that can cause strong folks to snap, that I have begged God, tough guy I fancy myself, “Please, Lord, make them stop. Please let me get some peace.” As the prayers went ungranted and the insanity around me persisted, I felt my own rage rising above the exhaustion and misery, no longer in a begging mood: “Lord, kill those motherfuckers, why don’t you!” I yelled at the Almighty, my own sanity so close to being gone that it seemed as if I were walking along a precipice and could see down to where I’d be falling, seeing myself shot, sanity a dead thing killed by the fall. I’d be afraid later on, terrified, when I reflected back on how close I had seemed to come to losing my mind, but at that moment all I could do was feel anger of a fiery kind: anger at the maniacs creating the noise and the stink and the madness; anger at my keepers and the real creators of this hell; anger at society for turning a blind eye to the torment and torture going on here that its tax dollars are financing; and perhaps most of all, anger at myself for doing all that I did that never should have been done that put me into the clutches of this beastly prison system to begin with. I would be angry at the world; enraged, actually, so burning hot was what I would be feeling.
I had wet toilet paper stuffed hard into both ears, sock folded up and pressed into my ears, a pillow wrapped around the sides and back of my head covering my ears, and a blanket tied around all that to hold everything in place, lying in bed praying for sleep. But still the noise was incredible, a thunderous cacophony of insanity, sleep impossible. Inmates lost in the throes of lavalike rage firing philippics at one another for even reasons they didn’t know, threatening to kill one another’s mommas, daddies, even the children, too. Nothing is sacred in SHU. It is an environment that is so grossly abnormal, so antithetical to normal human interactions, that it twists the innerds of men all around who for too long dwell there. Their minds, their morals, and their mannerisms get bent badly, ending far off-center. Right becomes whatever and wrong no longer exists. Restraint becomes a burden and is unnecessary with concrete and steel separating everyone, so inmates let it go. Day after day, perhaps year after year, the anger grows, fueled by the pain caused by the conditions till rage is born and burning so hot that it too hurts.
Trying to put into words what is so unlike anything else I know or have ever experienced seems an impossible endeavor, because there is nothing even remotely like it any place else to compare it to, and nothing that will do to you on the inside what so many years in SHU has done to me. All that I am able to articulate about the world of Special Housing Unit and what it is and what it does may seem terrible to you indeed, but the reality of living in this place for a full quarter of a century is yet even more terrible, still. You would have to live it, experience it in all its aspects and the fullness of its days and struggles added up, to really appreciate and understand just how truly terrible this plight of mine has been, and how truly ugly life in the box can be at times, even for just a single day. I spent nine years in Shawangunk’s box, six years in Great Meadow’s, and I’ve been here in Elmira’s SHU for four years now, and through all of this time I have never spent a single day in a Mental Health Unit cell because I attempted or threatened suicide, or for any other reason. I have thought about suicide in times past when the days had become exceedingly difficult to handle, but I’m still here. I’ve had some of my SHU neighbors succumb to the suicidal thoughts, though, choosing death over another day of life in the box. I have never bugged out myself, but I’ve known times that I had come too close. I’ve had neighbors who came to SHU normal men, and I’ve seen them leave broken and not anything resembling normal anymore. I’ve seen guys give up on their dreams and lose all hope in the box, but my own hopes and dreams are still alive and well inside me. The insidious workings of the SHU program have yet to get me stuck on that meandering path to internal destruction that I have seen so many of my neighbors end up on, and perhaps this is a miracle; I’d rather be dead than to lose control of my mind.
Had I known in 1987 that I would spend the next quarter-century in solitary confinement, I would have certainly killed myself. If I took a month to die and spent every minute of it in severe pain, it seems to me that on a balance that fate would still be far easier to endure than the last twenty-five years have been. If I try to imagine what kind of death, even a slow one, would be worse than twenty-five years in the box—and I have tried to imagine it—I can come up with nothing. Set me afire, pummel and bludgeon me, cut me to bits, stab me, shoot me, do what you will in the worst of ways, but none of it could come close to making me feel things as cumulatively horrifying as what I’ve experienced through my years in solitary. Dying couldn’t take but a short time if you or the State were to kill me; in SHU I have died a thousand internal deaths. The sum of my quarter-century’s worth of suffering has been that bad.
To some judges sitting on high who’ve never done a day in the box, maybe twenty-five years of this isn’t cruel and unusual. To folks who have an insatiable appetite for vengeance against prisoners who have committed terrible crimes, perhaps it doesn’t even matter how cruel or unusual my plight is or isn’t. For people who cannot let go of hate and know not how to forgive, no amount of remorse would matter, no level of contrition would be quite enough, only endless retribution would be right in their eyes. Like Judge Milroy, only an eternity in hell would satisfy them. Given even that in retribution, though, the unforgiving haters wouldn’t be satisfied that hell was hot enough; they’d want the heat turned up. Thankfully these folks are the few, that in the minds of the many, at a point, enough is enough.
No matter what the world would think about things that they cannot imagine in even their worst nightmares, I know that twenty-five years in solitary confinement is utterly and certainly cruel, moreso than death in or by an electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, bullet in the head, or even immolation could possibly be. The sum of the suffering caused by any of these quick deaths would be a small thing next to the sum of the suffering that this quarter-century in SHU has brought to bear on me. Solitary confinement for the length of time that I have endured it, even apart from the inhuman conditions that I have too often been made to endure it in, is torture of a terrible kind; and anyone who doesn’t think so surely knows not what to think.
I have served a sentence worse than death. TC Mark

Ameera al-Taweel, princess of Saudi Arabia

Ameera al-Taweel, princess of Saudi Arabia


India's Relations with Bhutan

India's Relations with Bhutan
India has always given a strategic importance to its neighbouring countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Maldives. India has been watchful in its diplomatic relations careful not to seem either intimidating or indulgent in their internal affairs.
In the case of Bhutan, India's stand was made clear by Nehru back in 1950's and Bhutan was co operative to India's efforts to a mutual understanding. Justifiably, India has been watchful about Chinese interests in the region, didn't want to antagonize Bhutan. Keeping this in mind, Nehru had made warm cordial relations with the royal family of Bhutan.
Recently, the fourth King of Bhutan introduced democracy in the country, and subsequently, Bhutan had an elected prime minster for the first time. Jgimy Thinley. Since then, there has been a noticeable change in Bhutan's foreign policy, which has strained its relationship with India.
The international outlook of Thinley was highlighted in his election campaigns, and  he remained true to his image. He is keen in establishing diplomatic ties with China, a move which has totally taken India by surprise.As a reactionary step, India had a check on its its economic dealings with Bhutan, Creating some difficulty in the national affairs of Bhutan. India also stopped giving certain aids to Bhutan, which is perceived as a punishment for Bhutan's supposed warming with China.
The opposition party, PDP, has strongly come against the ruling government's lukewarm attitude towards India. Thineley's agenda of Gross National Happiness' and it's international publicizing has also met with much criticism.